Category: Thought for the Week

High in the roof of Highley Church is a wooden carving of a face of a bearded man, his mouth open. He is the nearest we have in any of our local churches to a representation of the “Green Man”, a symbol that was very popular in Medieval times and who has recently undergone something of a revival. In classic carvings, the individual has leafy stems growing out of his mouth, leading to the idea that he was a representation of the spirit of the forest or, more generally, of nature itself. Today the Green Man has been adopted by many as a symbol of the “Green movement”. Some have seen him as a survivor of pre-Christian religion, venerated by country people when the local priest or Bishop was not watching. This idea has particular appeal to modern pagans. There are some problems with this version of events. The surviving carvings are largely in churches; not only is it necessary to assume the local priest did not see them, but neither did the higher clergy who regularly inspected all churches to ensure that they were in order. As far as I know, there is not a single case in a church court about a Green Man. I suspect the carvings were regarded simply as the medieval equivalent of wall-paper, decoration with no pagan associations. And finally, the penny seems to be dropping amongst the modern equivalent of the medieval church courts. The Chancellor (the chief judge) of the Diocese of Gloucester has accepted that the Green Man is not a pagan symbol and can be used on memorials in his diocese. Perhaps it is time to knock the cobwebs of our local Green Man.

Rev David Poyner

I am sometimes greeted with surprise when people find that I am a vicar and also a scientist. Around 20 years ago, some prominent scientists did try to take on religion but their arguments soon faded, not least because they often attacked ideas of God that few people of faith hold. When I attend scientific meetings to give talks or present data, I always wear my clerical collar. I rarely get a second glance, although some people have thanked me for openly displaying my faith, most recently at a meeting where I spoke in Zurich. Science and faith should not be in conflict if they remember they are asking different questions. Science is a way of looking at the natural world and understanding how it works. It cannot say much useful about the existence and nature of God, because God is above and beyond the natural world. Scientific methods do not work when we encounter the spiritual; that is when we must listen to our souls as they respond to mystery.

Rev David Poyner

And so another football season draws to it close, this Sunday (24th) with the last round of games of the Premiership. Some matters have been decided, but not all; glory or dejection still await the supporters of Spurs and West Ham, Bournemouth and Brighton. I am basking in Manchester Utd finishing 3^rd and qualifying for the Champion’s League (despite playing awful football until the manager was replaced); Aston Villa finally wining a trophy after a 30 year hiatus, Kidderminster Harriers getting promotion. Who knows what glory awaits with World Cup in June/July? And yet, come August, none of it will matter as a new season starts with probable misery and dejection at the end. That is the glory of sport; it can uplift, it can give memories that will not fade, but ultimately, none of the results actually matter. It is all a game and there will always be another coming up. But for followers of sport such as myself, what does matter is the camaraderie and the spirit, the ability to applaud excellence whenever I see it. Perhaps in this there is something close to the generous spirit of the Kingdom of God?

Rev David Poyner

Today (Friday) is St Matthias’s Day. Who?…. He is one of the many one-hit wonders of the Bible; elected by the remaining disciples to take the place of Judas who betrayed Jesus, never mentioned again. For obvious reasons, the Church does not have a St Judas’s Day, but Judas features as much in this day as Matthias. He is described as the “betrayer Judas” in the prayer used by the Church of England for today as we ask God to preserve us from “false apostles”. He gets short shrift in the Gospels; he was in charge of the money for the disciples but is accused of being a thief by John. It is undeniable that he was the disciple who betrayed Jesus. Although he took money for his services to the authorities, Judas was then overcome with remorse; Matthew preserves a tradition that he hung himself. It is hard to know what Jesus made of him; the Gospel writers had to rely on the memories of his other disciples, whose recollections would have been coloured by the act of betrayal and its consequences. Jesus was well aware of what Judas intended to do and did not stop him. I can only speculate as to what his feelings might have been, but perhaps there was some understanding of the confused, even tortured, workings of Judas’s mind. At the point of betrayal, Jesus called Judas “comrade”; the Greek word can mean a friend but could also be ironic. Be that as it may, he did not call him “betrayer”. Orthodox belief has Jesus descending to Hell after his death, to release those who had died before he came but now would chose to follow him. I am one of those who like to think that, during that time, Jesus particularly sought out his tormented friend Judas, to bring him redemption.

Rev David Poyner

It is unlikely that you will have missed that Sir David Attenborough is now 100; the BBC have been celebrating this for the last month. He has combined his passion of natural history and his skills as a TV presenter to shape the way nature documentaries are shown on the television. He has very largely shaped the national conversation on the environment and polls consistently show him as one of the most trusted figures.

Some look at the natural world and see in it evidence for a loving, creator God. Attenborough is not one of these. He often speaks of the examples of parasitic worms, that debilitate their (sometimes human) hosts in order to live; he can see little evidence from these of a loving creator . From my perspective as a professional biologist, I admire the beauty of the natural world; I know this from staring at cells  through a microscope. I can praise God for the beauty. However, I am aware that this is a consequence of evolution by natural selection, driven by random changes to our genes. This process does not need an intelligent creator to drive it; indeed it relies on chance and does lead to suffering as well as progress. But I would agree with those who say that this shows that if God has chosen to “create” through natural selection, then this is inevitable. If God has given the universe the freedom to progress by this mechanism, their must be pain. But the glory and the love are shown in what God knew all along; the wonder of nature that Sir David has spent his life revealing.

Rev David Poyner

By the time you read this, I will be coming to the end of a week’s holiday on the Shetland Isles. For over 30 years I have had an annual trip to a Scottish island with a group of friends. When we started, we would think nothing of stopping off en-route to climb a Munro; the name given to a Scottish hill over 3000 feet. These days we have learnt to savour the delights of 500 feet elevations on the coast. The islands have a mystical quality; I enjoy visiting the numerous sacred sites on them, where Celts, Picts and Norse have worshipped God. Although there may be little left now other than a few stones, these places remain holy. They are often called “thin places”, where the barriers between earth and heaven break down. Except, for me, it is not quite as simple as that. When I visit these places, I am fascinated by the history; my brain is active trying to make sense of how the stones were once buildings. I have archaeological experiences at them, but usually not spiritual ones. I am not alone; I recently read an article by Dr Catherine Fox, a writer who has had the same experience as myself. To her, these are actually thick places; so much is going on in her head, she loses sight of God. But, like myself, she perseveres. I do this because I know that the memory of these places will return to me, when my mind is less busy. Then I will not be trying to work out the shape of the church; all I will remember is that on this site, God was present to people. And in that memory, God becomes present to me; it turns my living room into a thin place.

Rev David Poyner

It may not have escaped peoples’ notice that there has been recently been an exchange of views between two prominent Americans; the US President, Donald Trump and the Pope, Leo XIV. It began with the Pope pointedly saying the Christ rejected the prayers of war mongers; the President responded by accusing Leo of being weak on crime and foreign policy and Leo in turn refuses to debate politics with Mr Trump. Christianity and the world of politics have always had an uneasy relationship. At one level the Bible has much to say about justice and peace; particularly in the Old Testament the prophets were vocal in their views on the rulers of Israel and Judah. Jesus followed in the line of prophets by speaking out on social justice and promoted a vision of how the world would be organised in the Kingdom of God. On the other hand, the Old Testament notably failed to identify any obviously successful way of governing a nation state; rule by “judges”, kings and priests all were tried at various times. Sometimes they seemed to work, more often they did not. And Jesus, whilst clear on the direction of travel, did not endorse any specific political manifesto, at least as far as I can see. For what it is worth, my own view is that as a Christian, I must be an active citizen, doing what I can to promote a Godly society. I also must recognise that there is no simple political philosophy on the left or right that will exclusively lead in that direction, albeit there are some that deny our common humanity that do not seem compatible with Biblical teachings. I pray for justice and the coming of God’s kingdom, I pray for all our political leaders, I may highlight issues but I hope I do not tell people how to vote. That is between themselves and God.

Rev David Poyner

This last week I have been in Zurich, attending the 11^th International Meeting on CGRP.  CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide), is a chemical found in most nerves in the body. It mainly seems to play a role in protecting us from damage. Sometimes however, if it is released inappropriately from nerves, it can cause problems. This seems to be what happens in some forms of migraine and new drugs to treat this work by blocking CGRP. It remains an exciting area where much remains to be discovered. There may be some big drugs to be discovered, which could be very lucrative. There is a danger that this could encourage a cut-throat approach in the field, where nobody trusts each other.

I have been doing research on CGRP since 1988 and have attended most of the meetings. The CGRP research community is a friendly one; we share our results and we support each other as best we can. The science we talk about at the meetings is interesting but these days I more value our friendships. Science, like many activities, can be a very cut-throat business. This week has once again reminded me that there are other ways of doing business; we do seem to try to love each other. 

Rev David Poyner

In Glazeley Church, there is a stained glass window next to the pulpit, in memory of Lt Philip Crooks, who was killed in the First World War. It is a fine piece of work; it shows Philip, drawn from a photograph welcomed by angels; actually portraits of his sisters. In the background is a field of wheat, ready for harvest; apparently a sign that, at 21, Philip’s work was done. He is greeted by the risen Christ. Back in August, we welcomed the Bishop of Hereford to Glazeley to mark the 150^th anniversary of the present building. He admired the window, but then added; “of course, it is theologically indefensible”. As a mere assistant curate, I did not press him on this, but merely nodded my head in agreement. But I suspect what disturbed him is what also disturbs me about the window; the risen Jesus holds out his hands to welcome Philip, but they are unmarked. In the Gospels, Jesus carried the marks of the nails on his hands and feet; the wound from the spear in his side. I think this says something very profound about the meaning of resurrection. It is indeed the triumph of Jesus over the grave, but that triumph does not wipe away scars from past suffering; memories are not wiped clean. Instead past pain is transfigured; the scars remain but they no longer have power to hurt. Easter is not about magic, it is about transformation.

Rev David Poyer

The church’s calendar builds to its climax over this coming week; as I write I am putting the last touches to the service for tomorrow, Palm Sunday. It is a bit rushed; I am just back from 5 days in Venice, largely spent in glorious churches. Most have representations of Palm Sunday; all have numerous images of Christ on the cross, some veiled in purple as is common at this time of year, to mark his death. Tomorrow we will have a procession into church as we re-enact the events of the first Palm Sunday. Sometimes this story is presented as though it were the whole city that turned out to welcome Jesus. However, our Bible reading for tomorrow suggests it was only Jesus’s followers who actually waved the palms; for the rest there was instead puzzlement, with the “whole” city asking “who is this?”. The churches of Venice witness how that question has been disturbing people for the last 2000 years; our service tomorrow challenges us to answer it today. 

Rev David Poyner